Ponder This Challenge - February 2026 - Blot-avoiding backgammon strategy
- Ponder This
The Fibonacci sequence is defined by and the recurrence relationship .
We call any sequence Fibonacci-like if it satisfies the recurrences for all .
The Fibonacci sequence contains many prime numbers. For instance, , etc. Our goal is to see how to generate a fibonnaci-like sequence without any prime numbers and relatively prime initial elements. This amounts to finding suitable relatively prime and .
The main step in the generation is finding a set [(p_1, m_1, a_1), (p_2, m_2, a_2),..., (p_t, m_t, a_t)] of triplets of the form (p_k, m_k, a_k) such that. . 2. For every natural number n, we have that for some k, n is equivalent to modulo (i.e. divides ). 3. is a prime divisor of the Fibonacci number 4. All the are distinct (the and can be non-distinct)
Given this set, one can generate and that satisfy1. is equivalent to modulo 2. is equivalent to modulo
and one can prove that this sequence does not contain any primes by using the following easy-to-prove identity, which holds for any Fibonacci-like sequence: .
Your goal is to find the set [(p_1, m_1, a_1),..., (p_t, m_t, a_t)] of triplets satisfying conditions 1-4 described above. (Hint: A set of 18 elements exists where the only primes dividing its elements are 2,3 and 5).
A bonus "*" will be given for computing and from the found set, and explaining why every element of is divisible by one of the elements, but not equal to it.
We will post the names of those who submit a correct, original solution! If you don't want your name posted then please include such a statement in your submission!
We invite visitors to our website to submit an elegant solution. Send your submission to the ponder@il.ibm.com.
If you have any problems you think we might enjoy, please send them in. All replies should be sent to: ponder@il.ibm.com
As many have pointed out, this problem was originally solved by Ronald Graham who found a specific set of triplets ( "A Fibonacci-like sequence of composite numbers" , also given in the excellent book "Concrete mathematics"). The challenge here was not copying the set from the paper!
Alternative sets can also be given, such as
s = [[2, 3, 3], [3, 4, 4], [5, 5, 5], [7, 8, 1], [17, 9, 1], [11, 10, 1], [61, 15, 2], [47, 16, 2], [19, 18, 7], [41, 20, 3], [23, 24, 14], [31, 30, 29], [2207, 32, 10], [107, 36, 22], [2161, 40, 13], [109441, 45, 4], [1103, 48, 26], [103681, 72, 70], [181, 90, 67], [769, 96, 58]]
Yielding
A0 = 44186851375096125029100906489607183486440
A1 = 23990976680675392254644252020033167422281