Ponder This Challenge - February 2026 - Blot-avoiding backgammon strategy
- Ponder This
Ponder This Challenge:
Ponder-this corner reached its 127th month, which is the maximal number that fits into signed byte. To celebrate this, we will praise you--our devoted solvers--share some of your flattering emails, and, of course, give you a special ponder-this question.
First, a salute to your persistence. Here's an example of one devoted follower who sent in solutions from the Intensive Care Unit:
"Let me just take this time to thank you and IBM for this wonderful web site. It has provided me with many hours of puzzle solving pleasure, and also some interesting conversations with my family.
The first three weeks of June this year I spent in the hospital. One of the nights in the ICU my family and I passed some of the time by talking about Ponder This. My daughter read the DNA problem to me at that time, and jokingly I told her I could be the first person to ever solve and answer a Ponder This while in the ICU. I actually sent my entry from my hospital bed about a week later.
Again thanks. Looking forward to next month's puzzle."
Many thanks to all of those who sent in great original and innovative riddles.
Of course it is heartwarming to get compliments like:
*"PS.: Thank you 10^10 times for maintaining this extremely enlightening challenge. Each time I participate, I discover a new world.
That's just great! ;-)"*
Lastly, we are proud to tell you about a scientific paper that one of our solvers published a year ago in the prestigious Physics Review Letter journal. The paper was inspired by April 2007's ponder-this puzzle.
ANTENEODO, C.; MORGADO, W.A.M. Critical scaling in standard biased random walks. Physical Review Letters 99(18): 180602-1-4 (2007):
"We acknowledge Brazilian agencies CNPq and Faperj for partial financial support and IBM research "Ponder This" for having drawn attention to this model."
November's puzzle is about replacing digits (0-9) with letters (ponderthis) where each letter represents a different digit. For example, the only solution for the problem
phd*pride + theorist + einstein
=
sir*idiot + hedonist + ronnie
is
670*63905 + 17523941 + 59841598
= 120,181,889 =
493*90921 + 75028941 + 328895
Furthermore, in this case, ponder=628053 and this=1794.
Now for our puzzle. If
I.e., the result of raising the 6-digits number "ponder" to the power of the 4-digit number "this" starts with the six most significant digits of "ponder", then what is the value (translated back to letters) of the first four digits of the following expression?
|.dr-.psi+.norton| |.ret-.en+.pier|
----------------- + ----------------
.poor\*.heron .distorted\*.terrier
Note the decimal points: .dr = 0.dr = (10*d+r)/100; and the absolute value signs (|).
Note that "ponder" and "this" should be six and four digits numbers respectively; i.e. "p" and "t" should not be zero.
We will post the names of those who submit a correct, original solution! If you don't want your name posted then please include such a statement in your submission!
We invite visitors to our website to submit an elegant solution. Send your submission to the ponder@il.ibm.com.
If you have any problems you think we might enjoy, please send them in. All replies should be sent to: ponder@il.ibm.com
Instead of computing the thousands of digits of ponderthis, we can use the following inequality to quickly verify that the first six digits are, indeed, “ponder” (frac stands for the fractional part):
frac(Log10(ponder)) ≤ frac(this*Log10 (ponder)) < frac(Log10 (ponder+1))
Out of the all permutations, only three match the condition:
ponder=504271 this=6983
ponder=813760 this=2459
ponder=835402 this=7619
Here comes the interesting part – although the expression gives three different results, in all three cases, the first four digits, translated back to letters, are “oded”.