Adversarial robustness vs. model compression, or both?
Shaokai Ye, Kaidi Xu, et al.
ICCV 2019
Most distributed machine learning systems nowadays, including TensorFlow and CNTK, are built in a centralized fashion. One bottleneck of centralized algorithms lies on high communication cost on the central node. Motivated by this, we ask, can decentralized algorithms be faster than its centralized counterpart? Although decentralized PSGD (D-PSGD) algorithms have been studied by the control community, existing analysis and theory do not show any advantage over centralized PSGD (C-PSGD) algorithms, simply assuming the application scenario where only the decentralized network is available. In this paper, we study a D-PSGD algorithm and provide the first theoretical analysis that indicates a regime in which decentralized algorithms might outperform centralized algorithms for distributed stochastic gradient descent. This is because D-PSGD has comparable total computational complexities to C-PSGD but requires much less communication cost on the busiest node. We further conduct an empirical study to validate our theoretical analysis across multiple frameworks (CNTK and Torch), different network configurations, and computation platforms up to 112 GPUs. On network configurations with low bandwidth or high latency, D-PSGD can be up to one order of magnitude faster than its well-optimized centralized counterparts.
Shaokai Ye, Kaidi Xu, et al.
ICCV 2019
Zhao Song, David P. Woodruff, et al.
NeurIPS 2016
Tsui Wei Weng, Huan Zhang, et al.
GlobalSIP 2018
Murat Kocaoglu, Karthikeyan Shanmugam, et al.
NeurIPS 2017