Sînziana Mazilu, José Iria
ICMLA 2011
A source of intellectual overhead periodically encountered by scientists is the call to be “hard,” to ensure good science by imposing severe methodological strictures. Newell and Card (1985) undertook to impose such strictures on the psychology of human-computer interaction. Although their discussion contributes to theoretical debate in human-computer interaction by setting a reference point, their specific argument fails. Their program is unmotivated, is severely limited, and suffers from these limitations in principle. A top priority for the psychology of human-computer interaction should be the articulation of an alternative explanatory program, one that takes as its starting point the need to understand the real problems involved in providing better computer tools for people to use. © 1986, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.
Sînziana Mazilu, José Iria
ICMLA 2011
Katherine Panciera, Reid Priedhorsky, et al.
CHI 2010
Jakita O. Thomas, Eric Mibuari, et al.
CHI 2011
Sören Bleikertz, Carsten Vogel, et al.
ACSAC 2014