Andrew R. Conn, Léa A. Deleris, et al.
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Could continuous optimization address efficiently logical constraints? We propose a continuous-optimization alternative to the usual discrete-optimization (big-M and complementary) formulations of logical constraints, that can lead to effective practical methods. Based on the simple idea of guiding the search of a continuous-optimization descent method towards the parts of the domain where the logical constraint is satisfied, we introduce a smooth penalty-function formulation of logical constraints, and related theoretical results. This formulation allows a direct use of state-of-the-art continuous optimization solvers. The effectiveness of the continuous quadrant penalty formulation is demonstrated on an aircraft conflict avoidance application.
Andrew R. Conn, Léa A. Deleris, et al.
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Andrew R. Conn, Katya Scheinberg, et al.
SIAM Journal on Optimization
Andrew R. Conn, Paula K. Coulman, et al.
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Andrew R. Conn, Marcel Mongeau
Mathematical Programming, Series B